Ishwar Prakash vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 8 August, 2016

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been
identified to be the Complainant/First-informant of the FIR in question
by Inspt. B.S. Gulia.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the petitioner came

Crl.M.C. 1731/2016 Page 1 of 7
to the house of the complainant/respondent no. 2 and offered him
property bearing no. WZ-674, Sadh Nagar, Palam Colony, New Delhi,
hereinafter referred to as “Property in question”, assuring the
complainant/respondent no. 2 that he is the owner of the said property
and that there are tenants residing at the property and that they would
vacate the property once the sale deed is transferred in the name of the
complainant. On 25.06.2013, the respondent no. 2 purchased the
property in question for the consideration amount of Rs. 45,20,000/-
and reached the property in question for taking the possession. The
tenants residing therein requested for some time to shift but later, the
complainant came to know that the tenants were in fact the brothers
and mother of the petitioner/accused no. 1 in the FIR in question.
Later, the complainant came to know that that FIR bearing
no.313/2014 has been registered against all the accused persons in PS
Palam Village. The complainant, upon confronting the accused
person, he was given life threats and was further threatened to be
implicated in false cases by them.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply