Mon. Sep 21st, 2020

Indosolar Ltd. vs Union Of India & Anr. on 3 July, 2015

1 min read

Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner: Dr. Ashwani Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ashish Kumar,
Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr Srivats Kaushal, Ms Kritika
Mehra & Ms Astha Sharma, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
1 The petitioner, is essentially aggrieved by the non-denial of subsidy
to it by the respondents, under a scheme which is titled as : “Special
Incentive Package Scheme” (in short the Scheme).
1.1 This scheme was notified by respondent no.1, to encourage,
investments for setting up semi-conductor fabrication, and other micro and
nano technology manufacturing industries, in India.
1.2 Since, the industry is supposedly capital intensive, and is required to
frequently adapt to technological changes, the Government of India (GOI)
thought it fit to create a conducive manufacturing environment by offering
incentive packages, which were comparable, with what other countries had
to offer.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply