Indera Singh vs Union Of India & Ors. on 25 May, 2016

1. The petitioner, who had retired as a Naik (GD) in the respondents
No.4 & 5/SSB in the year 2000, has filed the present petition praying inter
alia for directions to the respondents to grant him the benefits of the first
and second financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme w.e.f. 9.8.1999 in
the scales of Head Constable and Sub-Inspector, respectively, with all other
consequential benefits in terms of the OM dated 8.9.1999.
2. Counsel for the petitioner states that his client had submitted a
representation dated 10.3.2010 to the Director General, SSB claiming the
admissible benefits of financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme.
3. Counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance copy, states that
the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner is very sketchy as it does
not set out the material facts.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply