Hotel Taj Palace vs Shri Ravi Rohilla And Anr. on 14 March, 2016

1. The present petitioner, i.e., Hotel Taj Palace (hereinafter
referred to as the „petitioner-management‟) has preferred the present
Writ Petition under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the
Constitution of India challenging the impugned order dated
19.12.2003 passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-II,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the „learned
Labour Court/Industrial Adjudicator‟) in O.P. No. 568/1993.
2. The brief facts stated are that the respondent-workman, i.e., Shri
Ravi Rohilla, was appointed as General Tradesman w.e.f.

W.P. (C) No. 6426/2004 Page 1 of 13
Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply