Hero Motocorp Limited & Anr. vs State & Anr. on 30 May, 2018

1. These are three applications – two by Hero Motocorp Ltd. („HML‟)
(Petitioner No.1 and 5 respectively in Crl M.C. Nos. 2451 and 2462 of 2013)
and one by Mandeep Singh (Petitioner No.1 in Crl M. C. No. 2525 of 2013)
-seeking initiation of „appropriate criminal proceedings‟ against Mr. Roop
Darshan Pandey, Director of M/s Brain Logistics Private Limited („BLPL‟)
(Respondent No.2) alleging that he has scandalized and lowered the
authority of this Court and has prejudiced the due course of the pending
judicial proceedings.

2. Crl. MCs 2451/2013 and 2462/2013 by HML and its directors and Crl
M.C. No. 2525 of 2013 by Mandeep Singh the Proprietor of M/s Surya
Enterprises and others are petitions against the State (Respondent No.1) and

CRL.M.C. 2451/2013 & connected matters Page 2 of 13
BLPL under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure („Cr PC‟)
questioning an order dated 4th January, 2013 passed by the learned
Metropolitan Magistrate („MM‟), rejecting the status report of the police and
directing, in the application filed by BLPL under Section 156(3) Cr PC, that
the accused named in the complaint made by BLPL be summoned. The MM
directed that an FIR be registered against the accused named in the
complaint under Sections 406/420/467/469/471 and 120B of the Indian
Penal Code („IPC‟).

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply