1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties we concur with the view
taken by the learned Single Judge that pending hearing of the writ petition
no case was made out to grant interim stay, as prayed for by the appellant.
2. Our reasons for agreeing with the final view taken by the learned
Single Judge, who has not given any reasons for declining interim stay.
3. The appellant was appointed on contract by the second respondent, a
juristic entity under the Government of NCT of Delhi, to work as an
LPA No.883/2015 Page 1 of 4
Assistant Engineer (Civil). The contract was for a period of one year. It
expired, and was extended till further orders.
Source: Indian Kanoon