Hafiz Ahmad Hussain & Ors vs State & Ors on 10 November, 2016

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent no.2, present in the Court has been
identified to be the complainant/first informant and respondent no.3
has been identified to be the victim in the FIR in question by ASI Ved
Prakash.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the complainant
left for her mother’s house as she had received a phone call from her
brother informing her about an altercation between him and his wife
and her family, who had come to visit his wife. It is alleged that when

Crl.M.C. 2279/2016 Page 1 of 7
the complainant was climbing the stairs of her mother’s house, one
Khalid caught hold of her hair and banged her head on the wall,
rendering the complainant unconscious. It is further alleged that the
complainant was then taken to the hospital by her aunt, respondent
no.3 herein and one Ajam Khan.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply

*