My Legal Advisor, Lawyers india, free legal advice

Blog

K. Naveen Kumar Vs. Commercial Tax Officer [10/08/17]

K. Naveen Kumar Vs. Commercial Tax Officer [10/08/17]

K. Naveen Kumar Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & ANR.

[Civil Appeal No. 1024 2 of 2017]

KURIAN, J.

1. Mr. V.V.S. Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, seeks indulgence of this Court for one more chance to the appellant for purging the contempt.

2. We permit the appellant to present himself before the High Court with a DD drawn in the name of Commercial Tax Officer concerned of an amount of Rs.42,08,818/- and two DDs for a total sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (one lakh each in the names of the Telangana State Legal Services Authority and Andhra Pradesh State Legal Services Authority) and also present himself before the High Court with a written apology and also make an apology in the open court on Thursday, the 17th August, 2017.

3. We make it clear that in the event of the appellant taking steps in terms of what is noted above, it will be open to the High Court to pass appropriate orders, de hors the stand already taken in the impugned order. In order to enable this order to be worked out, the arrest, as ordered by the High Court, will be deferred for a period of one month.

4. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

5. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

6. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

……………………..J. (KURIAN JOSEPH)

……………………..J. (R. BANUMATHI)

New Delhi,

AUGUST 10, 2017.

Out Today

Item No.11 Court No.6 Section XII-A

Supreme Court of India

Record of Proceedings

K. Naveen Kumar Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & ANR.

[Civil Appeal No(s). 10242/2017]

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.70173/2017-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.70171/2017-SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE)

Date: 10-08-2017

This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Appellant(s)

Mr. V.V.S. Rao,Sr.Adv.

Mr. Harinath Gupta,Adv.

Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv.

Ms. Bina Madhavan,Adv.

Mr. Mrityunjai Singh,Adv.

Ms. Swati Bhardwaj,Adv.

Ms. Ramandeep Kaur,Adv.

Ms. Elizabeth Anthony,Adv.

For M/s. Lawyer S Knit & Co.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

In terms of the signed non-reportable judgment, the appeal is disposed of.

Mahabir Singh

Renu Diwan

Court Master

Assistant Registrar

Signed non-reportable judgment is placed on the file

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source: Supreme Court of India

Tags
Share

About Author

juris

juris

Related Articles

0 Comments

No Comments Yet!

There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?

Write a comment

Write a Comment