My Legal Advisor, Lawyers india, free legal advice


Prem Anand vs Smt. Santosh Alias Bawa Alias … on 4 September, 2017

1. Today Ms.Padma Priya, Advocate enters appearance through
the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.
2. However, a perusal of the paper book reveals that the defendant
had been proceeded ex parte vide order dated 10th March, 2017 and till
date, no application has been filed for recall of the said order. Even
today, no vakalatnama has been executed by the defendant in favour
of Ms.Padma Priya, Advocate.
3. On 01st September, 2017, this Court had heard the arguments
and reserved orders. Consequently, the Court has no other option but
to proceed ahead with the matter.

CS (OS) 522/2016 Page 1 of 7
4. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed for
recovery of possession, rendition of accounts and injunction with
respect to property situated at Plot No. A4/65, 66, 67, 68, Khasra No.
878, in Shanti Park Area of village Nawada, Delhi admeasuring 800
sq. yards of area (hereinafter referred to as ‘suit property’). The prayer
clause of the present suit is reproduced herein below:

Source: Indian Kanoon


About Author



Related Articles


  1. Aryan
    Aryan September 17, 14:02

    Sir is there any chance for defendant for apeel in Supreme Court in this case?

    Reply to this comment
  2. Aryan
    Aryan September 21, 06:02

    Is there any chance for defendant for apeel in Supreme Court in this case

    Reply to this comment

Write a Comment