Fri. Sep 18th, 2020

Dharmendra Kumar Sharma vs State & Anr on 22 September, 2015

1 min read

1. The petitioner has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this
Court for challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated
23.03.2015/26.03.2015 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate
whereby the petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 (for short ‘NI Act’) and has been
sentenced to undergo SI for a period of six months and pay a
compensation of the amount of Rs.2.25 lacs to the respondents. In
default of payment of compensation, the petitioner has been directed
to undergo further imprisonment for three months.
2. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the judgment and order
passed by the Appellate Court namely ASJ, Rohini Courts, Delhi,

whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed and the
conviction and sentence awarded by the Trial Court was upheld and
affirmed.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply