Delhi Development Authority vs Khem Chand & Ors on 4 March, 2016

1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 100 days in
filing the appeal.
2. The appellant/applicant, while asking for the delay of 100 days
in filing the second appeal to be condoned, submitted that the files
pertaining to the said matter was received in the office of the counsel
of DDA on 26.05.2015 with the authorisation to draft the second
appeal against the judgment and order dated 26.03.2015 passed by the
First Appellate Court.
3. It is submitted that counsel was not attending his office because
of some personal/family obligations and he was not informed by the

RSA 387/2015 Page 1 of 11
clerk about receipt of the file of the DDA. The files were kept in the
file cabinet and later were wrongly tied with W.P.(C) No.8252/2014
(Hardeep Kaur vs. Union of India). The aforesaid case was listed for
hearing on 21.08.2015 when it was discerned that the file of the
present case was also wrongly tied with W.P.(C) 8252/2014.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply