Dashrath vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Ors on 2 September, 2016

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been
identified to be the Complainant/First-informant and respondent no.3
has been identified to be the injured of the FIR in question by their
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that on 16.12.2015, the
complainant along with his friend riding bike bearing registration
no.DL5SU8004 (Bajaj Discover) were hit by a Tempo bearing

Crl.M.C. 2157/2016 Page 1 of 7
registration no. DL1lQ 4002. As a result of the hit, the complainant
and his friend fell off the bike and the driver of the said Tempo,
identified as one Vikram, fled the scene. The complainant was finally
taken to Max Hospital, Patparganj by his family members.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply