Thu. Dec 3rd, 2020

Darshan Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs. vs Bhagya Wanti & Ors. on 27 April, 2018

1 min read

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

C.M. Appl. No. 16955/2018 (for exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

RFA No.357/2018

2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code

of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed by the plaintiffs in the

suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 23.12.2017 by

which the trial court has dismissed the suit for partition filed by the

appellants/plaintiffs with respect to property of the father of the

RFA No.357/2018 Page 1 of 11
appellant/plaintiff. I may note that original plaintiff was Sh. Darshan

Singh son of Sh. Udai Singh, who expired during the pendency of the

suit and he was therefore substituted by his legal heirs who becomes

the plaintiffs and are therefore appellants in this appeal. Reference to

the plaintiff/plaintiffs or appellants will as per the context mean

reference to the original plaintiff or the present appellants/plaintiffs.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply