Bhim Singh Tanwar vs Collector Of Stamps & Anr. on 5 April, 2016

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents states that in view of
the realignment of Districts, respondent no. 1 should have been Collector of
Stamps/SDM Alipur and not SDM Narela. Learned counsel for petitioners

W.P.(C) 2981/2016, 2949/2016 Page 1 of 3
prays that respondent no. 1 be impleaded through Collector of Stamps,
Alipur. Ordered accordingly. Let an amended memo of parties be filed
during the course of the day.
2. It is pertinent to mention that present writ petitions have been filed
challenging the judgment and order dated 30th November, 2015 passed by
Additional District Judge-II (North West), Rohini in RCA Nos. 01/2012 and
02/2012 whereby the petitioners’ appeals were dismissed on the ground that
the documents sought to be registered fall in the category of sale deed and
not release deed/relinquishment deed. Petitioners further seek a direction to
respondent no.2-Sub-Registrar to register the documents as relinquishment

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply