Bharti Airtel Ltd vs Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd on 10 May, 2018

1. Ld. counsel for the caveator has put in appearance on advance

FAO(OS)No.77/2018 Page 1 of 13
notice and has been heard.
2. The caveat stands discharged.
CM No.19038/2018
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
The application is disposed of.
FAO(OS) 77/2018 & CM No.19037/2018
1. The respondent herein filed a suit, being CS(OS)No.156/2018,
on the Original Side of this court, against the present appellant
alleging that the advertisements issued by the appellant in the media,
with regard to an offer for its 4G customers during the T20 cricket
matches, were deceptive, misleading and misrepresentative to the
consumers inasmuch as the disclaimers in the said advertisements did
not make it clear to the intending customers that the subscription is
free only for the Hotstar application and that the consumers were still
required to pay data usage charges when they viewed the matches on
the said applications.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply