Tue. Nov 24th, 2020

Balwinder Singh Virdi & Anr vs Paramajeet Kaur on 28 May, 2018

1 min read

Caveat stands discharged.

C.M. Appl. No.21600/2018 (for exemption) in RFA No. 437/2018
C.M. Appl. No.21608/2018 (for exemption) in RFA No. 438/2018

2. Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions.

C.Ms. stand disposed of.

RFA No.437/2018 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 21599/2018 (under Order
XLI Rule 27 CPC), 21598/2018 (for stay)
RFA No.438/2018 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 21607/2018 (under Order
XLI Rule 27 CPC), 21606/2018 (for stay)

3. These are two Regular First Appeals under Section 96 of

the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). Both the appeals are filed

against the common judgment dated 12.1.2018. By the impugned

judgment two suits have been decided. The first suit is the suit filed by

the respondent/plaintiff for possession and recovery of damages. The

second suit is the suit filed by the appellants/defendants for declaration

and injunction for seeking declaration as null and void the documents

of title executed in favour of the husband of the respondent/plaintiff

dated 13.11.1980 and the subsequent sale deed dated 19.4.2005

executed by the husband of the respondent/plaintiff in favour of the

RFA Nso.437- 438/2018 Page 2 of 15
respondent/plaintiff. The suit property is property admeasuring 128

sq. yards bearing no. 1119, Rani Bagh, Shakur Basti, Delhi.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply