Anand Sriram Krishnan & Ors. vs State Govt. Of Nct Delhi & Anr. on 8 August, 2016

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been
identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question
by her counsel.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the marriage was

Crl.M.C. 1362/2016 Page 1 of 9
solemnized between petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 on
18.11.2010 as per the Hindu rites and ceremonies at New Delhi. From
the beginning, attitude of the in-laws of complainant was cruel and
they used to provoke the petitioner no.1/ husband to commit cruelty
against her. The petitioners used to harass and mentally torture the
complainant. Accused no.1 took the complainant to USA on
27.09.2011 and there he committed atrocities against her. On
14.02.2012, the complainant came to India for three weeks to attend
her friend’s marriage. However, in India the petitioners made sure that
the respondent no.2 does not return back to USA i.e. to petitioner no.1.
On 16.11.2012, the complainant left for USA to celebrate her wedding
anniversary with her husband on 18th November, 2012. However, in
USA the accused no.1 did not treat her properly and also asked her to
leave from there. Due to such indifferent and rude behavior of the
accused no.1, the complainant was forced to return back to India.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply