Amarjeet Singh vs Kuldeep Singh And Anr. on 13 July, 2018

2(i) In the subject suit which was filed by Smt. Shilawanti

against her two sons there is no dispute as regards the ownership

originally of Smt. Shilawanti of the suit property being the first floor

and second floor of E-216, New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi. Smt.

Shilawanti as per the subject suit prayed for possession and mesne

profits on account of the respondents/defendants being licencees but

who had failed to vacate the suit premises in spite of service of notice

RFA No.112/2012 Page 2 of 36
dated 17.5.1994 terminating their gratuitous licence. It is also to be

noted that Smt. Shilawanti/original plaintiff pleaded that she got two

public notices issued in two newspapers on 23.5.1994 disinheriting her

two sons being the two respondents/defendants, from all the movable

and immovable assets of Smt. Shilawanti.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply