Ajay Kumar vs The State ( Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 29 August, 2016

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been
identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question
by her counsel.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the marriage was
solemnized between petitioner/accused and the
complainant/respondent no.2 on 06.05.2011 according to Hindu rites

Crl.M.C. 1339/2016 Page 1 of 8
and ceremonies. The accused person and the in-laws of the
complainant were not satisfied with the dowry as a result of which
they started torturing the complainant from the very first day of
marriage. Upon the complainant’s denial they further mistreated her as
a result of which the complainant had to leave her matrimonial house.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply

*