2. Before coming to the contentions urged by the third defendant
seeking return of the plaint, it is essential to take note, albeit briefly, of
certain background facts.
3. The plaintiff claims to be the owner of suit patent in respect of a
method for the manufacture of an improved wear resistant metal part
and its wear resistant metal part in addition to a method for improving
wear characteristics of metallic parts used by various industries like
cement, mining and thermal power, etc., the said wear resistant metal
part meant to be used as wear part of grinding rollers or crushing
elements or vertical liner. It is clear from the plaint that the plaintiff is
a company incorporated having its principal office at Ahmedabad in
the State of Gujarat, all its activities relevant for the present litigation
being located there only.
Source: Indian Kanoon